FALK v. INDUSTRIAL COMM.


258 Wis. 109 (1950)

FALK, Appellant, vs. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION and others, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

December 5, 1950.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Hougen, Brady & Murphy of Manitowoc, and oral argument by Frank A. Murphy.

For the respondent Industrial Commission there was a brief by the Attorney General, and Mortimer Levitan and E. Weston Wood, assistant attorneys general, and oral argument by Stewart G. Honeck, deputy attorney general.


FRITZ, C. J.

So far as here pertinent, sec. 102.25 (1), Stats.,—which provides for appeals to this court from judgments entered upon review of any order or award of the Industrial Commission,—reads as follows:

"Said commission, or any party aggrieved by a judgment entered upon the review of any order or award, may appeal therefrom within thirty days from the date of service by either party upon the other of notice of entry of judgment. . . ....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases