HUGHES v. EISNER


8 N.J. Super. 351 (1950)

72 A.2d 901

THOMAS W. HUGHES, PLAINTIFF, v. RUDOLPH EISNER, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided April 20, 1950.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Miss Dorothy V. Reeve, for the plaintiff.

Mr. William Reich, for the defendant.


JAYNE, J.S.C.

The ancient doctrine of maintenance and champerty has had an interesting statutory and decisional lineage. In the passage of time the doctrine has lost most of its original animation and rigor. Indeed as early as 1792 it was determined to be "inapplicable" to the policy of this state. Schomp v. Schenck, 40 N.J.L. 195 (Sup. Ct. 1878). It seems, too, that courts of equity, from the earliest times, regarded the doctrine as "absurd"...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases