1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 88 F.Supp.
  5. 88 F.Supp. 271 (1950)
 

RICE BARTON CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES

No. 46814.

88 F.Supp. 271 (1950)

RICE BARTON CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES.

United States Court of Claims.

February 6, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank B. Wallis, Boston, Mass., for the plaintiff. John S. Mechem and Goodwin, Proctor & Hoar, Boston, Mass., were on the brief.

Mary K. Fagan, Washington, D. C., with whom was Assistant Attorney General H. G. Morison, for the defendant.

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and LITTLETON, WHITAKER, MADDEN and HOWELL, Judges.

JONES, Chief Judge.

In this case plaintiff seeks to recover from the United States under section 17(a) of the Contract Settlement Act of 1944, 41 U.S.C.A. § 117, fair compensation for certain engine parts which the plaintiff, because of certain alleged assurances and guaranties of the United States Maritime Commission, furnished to Springfield Machine & Foundry Company (hereinafter referred to as "Springfield"), and which Springfield delivered to Harrisburg...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases