PER CURIAM.
The appellant's first question, addressed to the order of the court holding his answer insufficient, seems to lack merit; and the second question, involving an order adjudging appellant guilty of contempt, is utterly without foundation because no appeal was ever taken from it.
Affirmed.
ADAMS, C.J., and TERRELL, THOMAS and ROBERTS...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.