SCHUTT v. KENOSHA


258 Wis. 83 (1950)

SCHUTT and another, Appellants, v. CITY OF KENOSHA, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

December 5, 1950.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by McGowan, Geffs, Geffs & Block of Janesville, and oral argument by Jacob Geffs.

For the respondent there was a brief by Robert V. Baker, city attorney, and Cavanagh, Mittelstaed, Sheldon & Heide of Kenosha of counsel, and oral argument by Mr. Baker and Mr. William A. Sheldon.


FAIRCHILD, J.

The decision from which plaintiffs appeal holds that an applicant for permission to operate under an ordinance such as this cannot accept the permit and simply "by reason of the language in the application for the permit in question" reserve at the same time the right to contest the constitutionality of the ordinance under which the permit is issued.

The learned trial judge was of the opinion that a party...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases