LINER v. MITTELSTADT


257 Wis. 70 (1950)

LINER, Administrator, Respondent, vs. MITTELSTADT and others, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

May 2, 1950.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants Mittelstadt there were briefs by Lueck, Skupniewitz & Lueck of Beaver Dam, and oral argument by A. W. Lueck.

For the appellant Potomac Insurance Company of the District of Columbia there was a brief by Dougherty, Arnold & Waters of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Suel O. Arnold.

For the respondent there was a brief by Hooker & Wagner of Waupun, and Wolfe, O'Leary & Kenney of Milwaukee, and oral argument by H. O. Wolfe and E. W. Hooker.


BROWN, J.

If the question of ownership of the vehicle at the time of the accident is determined the issues are simplified and that question will be considered first. The Uniform Sales Act, ch. 121, Stats., affects transactions of this sort. Portions of that act which the parties deem material are:

"121.18 Property in specific goods passes when parties so intend. (1) Where there is a contract to sell specific or ascertained goods, the property in them...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases