CICONTE v. SHOCKLEY


75 A.2d 242 (1950)

CICONTE v. SHOCKLEY.

Court of Chancery of Delaware, Sussex.

August 3, 1950.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel J. Layton, Jr., Georgetown, for plaintiff.

James M. Tunnell, of Tunnell & Tunnell, Georgetown, for defendant.


HARRINGTON, Chancellor.

The question is whether the plaintiff is entitled to injunctive relief against the defendant.

Ciconte, the plaintiff, owns a building consisting of seven stores, one-story high and under one roof, on the west side of First Street in the town of Rehoboth, occupied by tenants. A small part of the same building at the southern end is occupied by the plaintiff as a residence in the summer. The lot...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases