1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 186 F.2d
  5. 186 F.2d 120 (1950)
 

TIVOLI REALTY v. PARAMOUNT PICTURES

Nos. 10191-10194.

186 F.2d 120 (1950)

TIVOLI REALTY, Inc. v. PARAMOUNT PICTURES, Inc., et al., Interstate Circuit, Inc., and Texas Consolidated Theatres, Inc., appellants. TIVOLI REALTY, Inc. v. PARAMOUNT PICTURES, Inc., et al. Paramount Pictures, Inc.; Paramount Film Distributing Corp.; Loew's Inc.; Radio-Keith-Orpheum Corp.; RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.; Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.; Warner Bros. Pictures Distributing Corp.; Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.; Columbia Pictures Corp.; United Artists Corp.; Universal Pictures, Inc., and Universal Film Exchange, Inc., appellants. I. B. ADELMAN v. PARAMOUNT PICTURES, Inc., et al. Interstate Circuit, Inc. and Texas Consolidated Theatres, Inc., appellants. I. B. ADELMAN v. PARAMOUNT PICTURES, Inc., et al. Paramount Pictures, Inc.; Paramount Film Distributing Corp.; Lowe's Inc.; Radio-Keith-Orpheum Corp.; RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.; Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.; Warner Bros. Pictures Distributing Corp.; Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.; Columbia Pictures Corp.; United Artists Corp.; Universal Pictures, Inc., and Universal Film Exchange, Inc., appellants.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Decided December 6, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert E. Sher, Washington, D. C., Roy McDonald, New York City (Richards, Layton & Finger, Wilmington, Del., Hastings, Stockly, Walz & Wise, Wilmington, Del., Morris Steel, Nichols & Arsht, Wilmington, Del., Southerland, Berl & Potter, Wilmington, Del., on the brief), for appellants.

Thurman Arnold, Washington, D. C. (Killoran & Van Brunt, Wilmington Del., Arnold, Fortas & Porter, Washington, D. C., Thompson, Meek & Goldberg, Dallas, Tex., on the brief), for appellees.

Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and MARIS, GOODRICH, McLAUGHLIN, KALODNER, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The order complained of is not appealable under Section 1291 or Section 1292, Title 28 United States Code Annotated. See the opinion filed concurrently with this in Paramount Pictures, Inc., v. Rodney, 186 F.2d 111, petitions for mandamus.

The appeals will...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases