1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 189 Or.
  5. 189 Or. 97 (1950)
 

STEINER v. STEINER

189 Or. 97 (1950)

218 P.2d 464

STEINER v. STEINER

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed as modified May 16, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Austin Dunn argued the cause for appellant. On the briefs were Dunn & Jackson, of Baker.

Harold Banta argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Hallock, Donald, Banta & Silven, of Baker.

Before LUSK, Chief Justice, and BRAND, BELT, ROSSMAN and LATOURETTE, Justices.

DECREE MODIFIED AND AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

LATOURETTE, J.

Plaintiff Emma Steiner appeals from that portion of a decree granting her a divorce, which awarded to the defendant husband "$6,000.00 in cash, such sum to be in full of all rights and interest of the Defendant in the community or other income, earnings or property of the parties during the existence of said marriage." Defendant cross appeals from the entire decree.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases