ERESCH v. HINES

No. 16362.

225 P.2d 59 (1950)

122 Colo. 588

ERESCH et al. v. HINES.

Supreme Court of Colorado, en Banc.

October 30, 1950.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thornton H. Thomas, Jr., Burlington, for plaintiffs in error.

Frank A. Safranek, Limon, George M. Gibson, Colorado Springs, for defendant in error.


PER CURIAM.

HILLIARD, C. J., did not participate in the consideration of this cause.

HAYS, ALTER and HOLLAND, JJ., are of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed, whereas, JACKSON, STONE and MOORE, JJ., think that it should be reversed.

The judgment, therefore, must be affirmed by operation of law because of an evenly divided court, and no good purpose would be served by a statement of the issues or the reasons for the conclusions of the several...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases