HUGHES, J.
Both parties agree that the sole question in this case is whether damages flowed to appellant as a result of respondent's failure to settle the bill of exceptions. This is obviously a question of law properly disposed of on motion for summary judgment.
Appellant further concedes that it had the burden of satisfying the trial court that it sustained damages as a result of respondent's negligent conduct. It contends that it has discharged such duty...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.