PEEK v. PEEK

17104.

207 Ga. 72 (1950)

60 S.E.2d 138

PEEK v. PEEK.

Supreme Court of Georgia.

June 15, 1950.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Smith, Kilpatrick, Cody, Rogers & McClatchey, and Hoke Smith, for plaintiff in error.

Willingham, Gortatowsky & Morrison, contra.


HAWKINS, Justice.

1. The sole question presented by the writ of error in this case is whether or not there is any evidence of cruel treatment to support the verdict and decree in favor of the husband, granting a total divorce. Here, as in Alford v. Alford, 189 Ga. 630, 633 (7 S.E.2d 278), "each party asked for a divorce; both were granted divorce. We have not before us the question whether the evidence was sufficient to grant the wife a divorce, for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases