TERRIEN v. PAWTUCKET MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE CO.

No. 3903.

96 N.H. 182 (1950)

DAVID TERRIEN v. PAWTUCKET MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire.

March 7, 1950.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cotton, Tesreau & Stebbins (Mr. Stebbins orally), for the plaintiff.

Buckley, Zopf & Hamlin (Mr. Zopf orally), for the defendant.


DUNCAN, J.

In support of its motions for a nonsuit and directed verdict the defendant relies upon two principal contentions: that the loss suffered by the insured was not an "accidental" loss; and that the policy was inapplicable by reason of the express provisions of the "mechanical breakdown" exclusion. The defendant has also asserted that it was error to instruct the jury that the holes or depressions in the highway were "objects" within the meaning of the collision...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases