1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Okla.
  4. 203 Okla.
  5. 203 Okla. 75 (1950)
 

FORE v. FORE

No. 33476.

203 Okla. 75 (1950)

218 P.2d 366

FORE v. FORE.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

May 9, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wells & Wells, of Seminole, for plaintiff in error.

Charles S. Carl, of Wewoka, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error has appealed from a judgment entered against him in the trial court and on February 24, 1948, he filed his brief. The authorities therein cited reasonably sustain the allegations of error. The defendant in error has filed no brief and has offered no excuse for such failure. Under such circumstances as stated in Gooldy v. Hines, 186 Okla. 583, 99 P.2d 498, it is not the duty of this court to search the record for some theory upon which...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases