STIKL v. DEBOTH


258 Wis. 17 (1950)

STIKL, Respondent, vs. DEBOTH and wife, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

November 8, 1950.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Martin, Clifford, Warne, Duffy & Dewane of Green Bay, and oral argument by W. O. Warne.

For the respondent there was a brief by Kaftan, Kaftan & Kaftan of Green Bay, and oral argument by Robert J. Kaftan.


BROWN, J.

The action was tried to the court which made findings of fact and conclusions of law in favor of plaintiff. Under familiar principles of law the findings must be sustained unless against the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence. The only finding material to our decision is that which interpreted the contract as one for compensation at cost plus ten per cent, unlimited by the recitation concerning...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases