KROLL v. McGRATH

No. 3954-49.

91 F.Supp. 173 (1950)

KROLL v. McGRATH, U. S. Atty. Gen.

United States District Court District of Columbia.

April 4, 1950.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles E. Campbell, New York City, Malcolm Rich, New York City, Harry F. Riley, Washington, D. C., James W. Dent, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

Walter T. Nolte, Washington, D. C., Ira B. Kirkland, Washington, D. C., for defendant.


MATTHEWS, District Judge.

This is an action under Section 9(a)1 of the Trading with the Enemy Act to recover U. S. Letters Patent No. 1,986,585 seized by the Alien Property Custodian. The (defendant) Attorney General filed a Motion to dismiss or for summary judgment. The ground of the Motion is that the action is barred because not instituted within the time specified in Section 33 of the Act.2

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases