1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 6 N.J.
  5. 6 N.J. Super. 255 (1950)
 

KRAMER v. R.M. HOLLINGSHEAD CORP.

6 N.J. Super. 255 (1950)

71 A.2d 139

SAMUEL KRAMER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. R.M. HOLLINGSHEAD CORP., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 1, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Joseph Lipkin argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent (Messrs. Lipkin, Neutze & Lipkin, attorneys).

Mr. S.P. McCord, Jr., argued the cause for defendant-appellant (Messrs. Starr, Summerill & Davis, attorneys).

Before Judges JACOBS, DONGES and BIGELOW.

The opinion of the court was delivered by DONGES, J.A.D.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Camden County District Court in favor of the plaintiff.

The only question presented for our determination is whether the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is applicable.

It appears from the agreed statement of fact that the plaintiff was the owner of a Buick sedan. He testified that on Saturday, June 26, 1948, he purchased a can of "Motor Tune-Up,"...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases