1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 90 F.Supp.
  5. 90 F.Supp. 167 (1950)
 

STEINBERG v. HARDY

Civ. A. No. 2806.

90 F.Supp. 167 (1950)

STEINBERG et al. v. HARDY et al.

United States District Court D. Connecticut.

March 24, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry Tulin, Hartford, Conn., Abraham Marcus, New York City, of counsel, for plaintiffs.

Wiggin & Dana, by Frank E. Callahan, New Haven, Conn., for defendants Hardy & Buckley.

Thompson, Weir & MacDonald, by Curtiss K. Thompson, New Haven, Conn., for defendants Barium Steel Corporation and Central Iron & Steel Co.

HINCKS, Chief Judge.

This is a secondary action under Rule 23(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., by two alleged stockholders of Barium Steel Corp. ("Barium") a Delaware corporation, naming as defendants Barium, Central Iron and Steel Co. ("Central"), which is a Pennsylvania corporation wholly owned by Barium, Hardy who was a Barium director and one Buckley both of whom are citizens of Connecticut. The complaint alleges that the corporate defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases