FIRST NAT. BANK OF SPRINGFIELD v. DI TARANTO


9 N.J. Super. 246 (1950)

75 A.2d 907

FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF SPRINGFIELD, NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CHARLES G. DI TARANTO, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 18, 1950.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Herbert A. Kuvin argued the cause for the plaintiff-appellant.

Mr. David A. Rappeport argued the cause for the defendants-respondents.

Before Judges JACOBS, EASTWOOD and BIGELOW.


The opinion of the court was delivered by EASTWOOD, J.A.D.

The plaintiff, First National Bank of Springfield, New Jersey (hereinafter referred to as the "Bank"), instituted its suit to enforce payment of a promissory note made by defendants to the Tidey Heating and Specialty Company and purchased by the plaintiff from Tidey. A verdict of no cause of action was returned by the jury and the Bank appeals the judgment entered thereon.

Plaintiff advances the following...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases