1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 7 N.J.
  5. 7 N.J. Super. 243 (1950)
 

HOLSCHER v. BD. OF COM'RS OF CITY OF CAMDEN

7 N.J. Super. 243 (1950)

72 A.2d 883

ERNST HOLSCHER, TRADING AS CRESCENT BOTTLING CO.; DR. PEPPER BOTTLING CO. OF CAMDEN, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION; LOUIS ROSENBERG, ABRAHAM ROSENBERG AND SAMUEL ROSENBERG, TRADING AS NEW JERSEY BOTTLING WORKS; AND VINCENT RACZYKOWSKI, TRADING AS NEWPORT BOTTLING WORKS, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF CAMDEN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 25, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Meyer L. Sakin, attorney for and of counsel with plaintiffs-appellants, argued the cause.

Mr. Norman Heine argued the cause for the defendant-respondent (Mr. John J. Crean, attorney).

Before Judges JACOBS, McGEEHAN and EASTWOOD.

The opinion of the court was delivered by EASTWOOD, J.A.D.

The validity of an ordinance entitled: "An Ordinance to license and regulate wholesale bottling establishments, trades or businesses within the City of Camden. New Jersey, and to fix the fee to be paid for such licenses and to prohibit all persons and places unlicensed from acting, using or being used for such uses and purposes and providing for a penalty for the violation hereof," adopted March 15, 1928,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases