HOFER v. CARINO


4 N.J. 244 (1950)

72 A.2d 335

WILLIAM R. HOFER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. JOHN J. CARINO AND ANITA R. CARINO, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided March 27, 1950.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. James B. Avis argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant.

Mr. E. Milton Hannold argued the cause for defendants-respondents (Messrs. Hannold & Hannold, attorneys).


The opinion of the court was delivered by CASE, J.

This action in ejectment concerns a disputed boundary line. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment entered on the granting of defendants' motion for a direction of verdict. He alleges as error the granting of that motion and the denial of a like motion in his own behalf.

The land is in the village of Williamstown, Gloucester County, near the intersection of a highway formerly known as Williamstown and Coles Mill...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases