ROSS v. TETRADIS


7 N.J. Super. 224 (1950)

72 A.2d 891

DOLORES ANN ROSS, BY HER GUARDIAN AD LITEM, SANTI ROSS AND SANTI ROSS, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. NICHOLAS TETRADIS, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. DOLORES ANN ROSS, BY HER GUARDIAN AD LITEM, SANTI ROSS AND SANTI ROSS, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. PETER METZ, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 25, 1950.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Hyman W. Rosenthal argued the cause for the plaintiffs-appellants (Messrs. Marcus & Levy, attorneys).

Mr. William F. Hinchliffe argued the cause for the defendant-respondent, Nicholas Tetradis.

Mr. Hugh C. Spernow argued the cause for the defendant-respondent, Peter Metz.

Before Judges JACOBS, McGEEHAN and EASTWOOD.


The opinion of the court was delivered by EASTWOOD, J.A.D.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of dismissal. The two separate actions instituted against defendants, Nicholas Tetradis, owner, and Peter Metz, tenant, grounded on their alleged negligence and maintenance of a nuisance as the proximate cause of the injuries suffered by plaintiff, Dolores Ann Ross, a minor, were tried together.

Plaintiffs' proofs establish...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases