1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 93 F.Supp.
  5. 93 F.Supp. 134 (1950)
 

AKTIEBOLAGET BOFORS v. UNITED STATES

Civ. 1720.

93 F.Supp. 134 (1950)

AKTIEBOLAGET BOFORS v. UNITED STATES.

United States District Court District of Columbia.

October 10, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George Morris Fay, U. S. Atty., and Ross O'Donoghue, Asst. U. S. Atty., Washington, D. C., for defendant, for the motion.

C. E. Rhetts and Warner W. Gardner, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff, opposed.

HOLTZOFF, District Judge.

This is a companion action to 93 F.Supp. 131. Here the complaint prays for a declaratory judgment in effect adjudicating that the Government was without authority to permit the use of the Bofors gun by others than itself. The discussion in the opinion of this Court in the other action applies equally to this suit.

The following additional considerations are pertinent. No action may be entertained...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases