PER CURIAM.
Sufficient evidence was introduced to sustain the conviction of Leon Wyche, but we do not find testimony establishing beyond a reasonable doubt that the appellant Abraham Clemons was "unlawfully present, counselling, hiring, procuring, encouraging, commanding, inciting, and otherwise inducing the said Leon Wyche to do and commit" the crime charged.
So the judgment against Leon Wyche is affirmed and the one against Abraham Clemons is reversed.<...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.