LAY v. CAHILL.

No. 32040.

154 Ohio St. 49 (1950)

LAY, APPELLEE, v. CAHILL, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided June 21, 1950.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Roof & Roof, for appellee.

Messrs. Wiles & Doucher, Mr. J. Ewing Smith and Mr. Robert F. Allen, for appellant.


BY THE COURT. The collision herein would not have occurred had both plaintiff and defendant exercised that degree of care which reasonable and prudent persons, having due regard for the protection of others, would have exercised under the same or similar circumstances.

An examination of the bill of exceptions convinces a majority of this court that, even though the defendant was negligent in stopping his automobile and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases