JERSEY CITY PRINTING CO. v. KLOCHANSKY


8 N.J. Super. 186 (1950)

73 A.2d 742

JERSEY CITY PRINTING COMPANY, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. MIKE KLOCHANSKY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 2, 1950.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Isidor Kalisch argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Stanley U. Phares, attorney).

Mr. Aaron Gordon argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Morris Edelstein, attorney).

Before Judges McGEEHAN, COLIE and EASTWOOD.


PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Duffy and reported in 9 N.J.Super. 361. Appellant argues that the testimony of its lay witnesses was supported by the moving pictures, was apparently truthful and inherently probable, and was not categorically contradicted by any other testimony or by any other proved fact, or by any testimony impeaching the truth or veracity...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases