HOFFMAN v. KRAUSE


8 N.J. Super. 163 (1950)

73 A.2d 610

EMMA HOFFMAN, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. ALBERT O. KRAUSE, TRADING AS LESSER DRUG STORE, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 2, 1950.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Harry Tartalsky argued the cause for the petitioner-appellant (Messrs. O'Brien & Tartalsky, attorneys).

Mr. Seymour A. Smith argued the cause for the respondent-respondent (Messrs. Hein & Smith, attorneys).

Before Judges McGEEHAN, COLIE and EASTWOOD.


The opinion of the court was delivered by EASTWOOD, J.A.D.

The only issue is whether petitioner's decedent suffered a compensable accident. Both the Workmen's Compensation Bureau and the Bergen County Court dismissed her petition. Petitioner appeals from the judgment of the County Court.

Decedent, Carl F. Hoffman, had been in the employ of respondent as a pharmacist for approximately two and one-half years. At the time of his death he was fifty-six and had...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases