The defendant contends that (1) our statute does not prohibit the distribution of punch boards and (2) that the present indictment is bad in that it is vague and uncertain.
As to the first point, I do not understand the defendant seriously to contend that punch boards are not gambling devices. See City of Wichita v. Stevens, 167 Kan. 408, 207 P.2d 386; People v. Lippert, 304 Mich. 685, 8 N.W.2d 880. Its...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
