1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 36 Wn.2d
  5. 36 Wn.2d 120 (1950)
 

COPPO v. VAN WIERINGEN

Nos. 31209, 31210.

36 Wn.2d 120 (1950)

217 P.2d 294

SHIELDS J. COPPO et al., Respondents, v. A.R. VAN WIERINGEN, Appellant. BILL MYERS et al., Respondents, v. A.R. VAN WIERINGEN, Appellant.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department Two.

April 6, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

W.E. Du Puis, for appellant.

Durham, Guimont & Durham, for respondents.

HILL, J.

The question presented is whether the trial court abused its discretion in granting new trials in two actions for damages resulting from an automobile collision, which actions were consolidated for trial and are consolidated on this appeal.

On May 1, 1948, Shields J. Coppo and his wife were in the front seat of their automobile and Bill Myers and his wife were in the back seat. While stopped for a red light,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases