1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 61 S.E.2d
  5. 61 S.E.2d 93 (1950)
 

STATE v. ELLIOTT

No. 3.

61 S.E.2d 93 (1950)

232 N.C. 377

STATE v. ELLIOTT et al.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 20, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Walter H. Oakey, Jr., Hertford, for defendant-appellant.

Attorney General Harry McMullan, Assistant Attorney General T. W. Bruton, and John R. Jordan, Jr., of Staff, Raleigh, for the State.

BARNHILL, Justice.

The appellant excepts for that the court failed to charge the jury that in order to find the defendants guilty of possession or transportation of intoxicating liquors as charged, they must find defendants had guilty knowledge of the presence of the liquor in the automobile. This exception must be sustained.

A person is presumed to intend the natural consequences of his act. State v. Phifer, 90 N.C. 721; State v. Barbee, 92 N.C. 820; State...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases