1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 8 N.J.
  5. 8 N.J. Super. 144 (1950)
 

HUDDLESON v. LERMAN

8 N.J. Super. 144 (1950)

73 A.2d 596

MARY HUDDLESON, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CHARLES LERMAN, TRADING AS PARAMOUNT LINGERIE SHOP, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND FLOOR-BRITE WAXING SERVICE, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 1, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Robert S. Hartgrove argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent.

Mr. John F. Ryan argued the cause for defendant-appellant (Messrs. Ryan & Saros, attorneys).

Before Judges JACOBS, DONGES and BIGELOW.

The opinion of the court was delivered by DONGES, J.A.D.

The defendant, Charles Lerman, T/A Paramount Lingerie Shop, appeals from a judgment in the Law Division of the Superior Court, entered upon a verdict in favor of the plaintiff.

The defendant argues that the court erred in not dismissing the case at the conclusion of plaintiff's entire case and further that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases