Findings of fact and conclusions of law inconsistent herewith are reversed and new findings and conclusions will be made. The Arkansas decree of divorce obtained by the respondent husband, in an action in which the appellant wife was not served and in which she did not appear, was necessarily predicated upon a finding by the Arkansas court that respondent was domiciled in that State, and it is entitled to full faith and credit here (Williams v. North Carolina,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
ROSE v. ROSE
277 A.D. 1137 (1950)
Rhea Rose, Appellant, v. Joseph Rose et al., Respondents
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
December 11, 1950.
December 11, 1950.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
