Per Curiam.
In our opinion defendants' motion for summary judgment under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice should have been granted as the uncontested documentary evidence annexed to the affidavits shows that plaintiff cannot establish a cause of action for rescission and the return to plaintiff of the shares of the capital stock in question.
The documentary evidence was not annexed to the complaint and accordingly defendants' motion for judgment...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
