WATERMAN CORP. v. JOHNSTON


276 A.D. 1063 (1950)

Waterman Corporation et al., Respondents, v. James M. Johnston et al., Defendants; Doeskin Products, Inc., Appellant, and Nat E. Heit et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

April 11, 1950.


Order affirmed, without costs.

Per Curiam.

The injunction order may not be interpreted to preclude the defendant-appellant from taking appropriate steps in the pending derivative stockholder's action brought on its behalf. More particularly, the injunction may not be interpreted to preclude participation by the defendant-appellant in all examinations before trial, discovery and inspection or other pretrial proceedings, nor to bar that defendant from...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases