Appellants dispute the finding of an occupational disease, claiming that any use of the hands would produce the same result in a person inherently susceptible to that disease. The claimant was a chef. Medical testimony clearly created a question of fact that while all chefs are not susceptible to Dupuytren's contracture, the nature of the occupation will produce the disability in a person who has the latent tendency. It is therefore an occupational disease and the board was...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
