MILSTREY v. SCHENECTADY RY. CO.


276 A.D. 1039 (1950)

Muriel H. Milstrey, Respondent, v. Schenectady Railway Co., Defendant, and Edward H. Zehner, Appellant Raymond Hallenbeck, Respondent, v. Schenectady Railway Co., Defendant, and Edward H. Zehner, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

March 8, 1950.


Defendant Zehner, who alone appeals from the judgments and orders arising from an injury to a passenger in the Schenectady Railway Company's bus, was approaching an intersection bounded by streets merging at less than right angles. Under the definition established by subdivision 6 of section 2 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law, the area of merger of the streets was a statutory "intersection", in which the vehicle on the right merging street had the right of way under equal conditions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases