Respondent asserted, in his complaint and in his affidavit in support of his motion for the injunction, that he was induced to enter into the agreement by fraudulent representations that the Commercial Rent Law (L. 1945, ch. 3, as amd.) no longer controlled the premises which he occupied. He also asserted that, as a matter of law, the agreement which he made was void and unenforcible, that when he made the agreement he believed he could obtain other premises in which to conduct...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
