Judgments unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs to respondents-appellants.
In our opinion the County Judge correctly decided that plaintiff, who had rented the occupied premises, which included garages and a parking lot, as well as residential space, for the purpose of conducting a rooming house and renting the garages and parking space as a business venture, was not entitled to recover under the statute, which was designed to protect occupants of housing accommodations...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
