BERKLIFF UNDERGARMENT CORP. v. WEISSMAN


277 A.D. 964 (1950)

Berkliff Undergarment Corp., Respondent, v. K. Bernard Weissman et al., Copartners Doing Business as Wek Sales Company, et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

October 3, 1950.


Order vacating notice to take the testimony before trial of a witness and the subpœna served upon him unanimously reversed, with $10 costs, and the examination directed to proceed at a time to be fixed.

The mere fact that the witness is an attorney does not, in and of itself, bar his examination. He may, upon his examination, raise the question of privilege if it appears that he is being asked to disclose confidential communications between attorney and client...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases