SPLINTER v. CITY OF NAMPA

Nos. 7538, 7537.

215 P.2d 999 (1950)

SPLINTER v. CITY OF NAMPA et al. METZER v. CITY OF NAMPA et al.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

On Rehearing April 4, 1950.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Earl E. Garrity, Nampa, Elam & Burke, Boise, for appellants.

J. F. Martin, Boise, Frank F. Kibler, Nampa, G. H. van de Steeg, Nampa, for respondents.


GIVENS, Justice.

These two cases were heard together; the main, fundamental issues being common to both. The differences are that appellant Splinter owned the building where the explosion as hereinafter detailed, occurred, alleging the storage tank was installed without his knowledge or consent; appellant Metzer was employed as a waitress in the restaurant, the operators of which were lessees from appellant Splinter.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases