Appellant contends that the arbitrators were not impartial; that he had no opportunity to have his witnesses sworn; that no testimony was taken; that the court erred in assessing costs; that the award was not made within the time contemplated by the agreement; that it was not properly acknowledged; that there are many other reasons why the award should not have been confirmed. The Special Term properly decided that these contentions lacked merit. The court fixed the arbitrators...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
