BALL v. STOKELY FOODS, INC.

No. 31133.

37 Wn.2d 79 (1950)

221 P.2d 832

MARSTON BALL et al., Respondents, v. STOKELY FOODS, INC., Appellant.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department Two.

August 31, 1950.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eggerman, Rosling & Williams and Joseph J. Lanza, for appellant.

Ward & Barclay, for respondents.


ROBINSON, J.

These were five separate actions, consolidated for purposes of trial, brought by pea growers in Skagit county, against Stokely Foods, Inc. Plaintiffs sought to recover damages allegedly sustained as a result of defendant's delay in harvesting their peas during 1947. From verdicts and judgments in favor of plaintiffs, defendant has appealed.

The suits are predicated upon written contracts, which are substantially identical in terms. They provide...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases