BORING v. UNITED STATES

No. 4014.

181 F.2d 931 (1950)

BORING v. UNITED STATES et al.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

April 29, 1950.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James H. Ross, Oklahoma City, Okla. (Looney, Watts, Ross, Looney & Smith, Oklahoma City, Okl., on the brief), for appellant.

Tom W. Garrett, Oklahoma City, Okl. (Clarence Northcutt, Ponca City, Okl., and Tom W. Garrett, Jr., Oklahoma City, Okl., on the brief), for appellee Mary Lucille Boring.

Before HUXMAN, MURRAH and PICKETT, Circuit Judges.


HUXMAN, Circuit Judge.

The question in this case is whether Robert E. Boring, a soldier in the late war, effectively changed the beneficiary in his National Service Life Insurance Policy from his mother, Junie Pearl Boring, to his wife, Mary Lucille Boring. Upon his death, both the wife and his mother filed claims for the insurance benefits. The Veterans Administration determined the wife to be the beneficiary. The mother thereupon instituted this action in the United...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases