1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 9 N.J.
  5. 9 N.J. Super. 101 (1950)
 

HORSMAN DOLLS, INC., v. U.C.C. OF N.J.

9 N.J. Super. 101 (1950)

75 A.2d 154

HORSMAN DOLLS, INC., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION COMMISSION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided August 15, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Samuel Kaufman argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Bilder, Bilder & Kaufman, attorneys).

Mr. Herman D. Ringle argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Charles A. Malloy, attorney).

Before Judges McGEEHAN, COLIE and EASTWOOD.

The opinion of the court was delivered by COLIE, J.A.D.

This matter is before the court as an appeal under Rule 3:81-8 from final decisions of the Unemployment Compensation Commission rendered April 1, 1948. Certiorari was allowed by a justice of the former Supreme Court prior to September 15, 1948.

Horsman Dolls, Inc., is a subject employer under the Unemployment Compensation Act. The act as originally passed

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases