Defendants moved for summary judgment on the ground that plaintiff performed services as a real estate broker and may not recover in this action because (a) he did not have a real estate broker's license in Arizona, and (b) the contract of hiring was oral. Both of these defenses would be good under Arizona statute if the contract was one to act as a real estate broker. If plaintiff's contract was merely one of employment and not to act as a broker, the defenses would not...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
