TYRRELL v. LAY


197 Misc. 858 (1950)

Mary Tyrrell et al., Respondents, v. William Lay et al., Appellants.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department.

May 25, 1950.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bernard Meyerson and A. I. Madison for appellants.

Nicholas Reigi for respondents.

STEINBRINK, FENNELLY and RUBENSTEIN, JJ., concur.


Per Curiam.

There was no privity of contract between plaintiff husband and defendant Lay which would afford any basis for a recovery for loss of his wife's services and medical expenses on the theory of breach of warranty. (Gimenez v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 264 N.Y. 390, 393.)

The judgment in favor of plaintiff wife against defendants, and in favor of plaintiff husband against defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases