1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 90 F.Supp.
  5. 90 F.Supp. 959 (1950)
 

NEW YORK SURPLUS & JOB. CORP. v. S. S. ANDREW JACKSON

90 F.Supp. 959 (1950)

NEW YORK SURPLUS & JOBBING CORPORATION v. S. S. ANDREW JACKSON, her engines, etc., et al.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

June 22, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hill, Rivkins & Middleton, New York City, and Arthur O. Louis and Mark T. Walsh, New York City, advocates, for libelant.

Kirlin, Campbell, Hickox & Keating, New York City, and L. de Grove Potter, New York City, for respondents.

McGOHEY, District Judge.

Libelant excepted to all 118 interrogatories propounded by respondents, on the following grounds: (a) that they are so numerous as to be unreasonable; (b) that they are irrelevant, incompetent and immaterial; and (c) that they ask the most minute details concerning each of 3840 packages which comprised the shipment in suit. It is claimed that the shipments were in damaged condition on arrival in New York, although in good condition when received...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases