Defendant's impression that judicial privilege would attach to any circularization of the stockholders by petitioners, so that false information might thereby be imparted with immunity, is mistaken. There would be no judicial privilege in such circularization and petitioners must assume the same responsibility for their communications to stockholders as if there were no suit pending.
Order unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
