DARLING & CO. v. MEDLEY

No. 11134.

185 F.2d 835 (1950)

DARLING & CO. v. MEDLEY.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

December 5, 1950.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas E. Lipscomb, Cleveland, Ohio, Thompson, Hine & Flory, Thomas E. Lipscomb, Cleveland, Ohio, and Harold S. Walters, Chicago, Ill., on the brief, for appellant.

Chester K. Gillespie and John G. Pegg, Cleveland, Ohio, Chester K. Gillespie, and John G. Pegg, Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief, for appellee.

Before HICKS, Chief Judge, and SIMONS and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges.


McALLISTER, Circuit Judge.

From a judgment in the amount of $15,000 rendered in favor of Henry H. Medley in an action for malicious prosecution, the defendant, Darling & Company, appeals, claiming that there was probable cause for the issuance of the warrant of arrest; that the burden of proving want of probable cause was upon appellee; and that he did not sustain the burden of such proof. Appellant further claims that the award by the jury of $10,000 compensatory...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases