BRAINARD v. ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RY. CO.

No. 3440.

87 F.Supp. 921 (1950)

BRAINARD v. ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RY. CO.

United States District Court D. Kansas.

January 5, 1950.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hal M. Black, of Wichita, Kansas, and Marion J. Hannigan, of Chicago, Illinois, for the plaintiff.

W. E. Stanley, and William C. Hook (Depew, Stanley, Weigand, Hook & Curfman), of Wichita, Kansas, and Thomas J. Barnett, Floyd J. Stuppi, and Philip E. Von Ammon, of Chicago, Illinois, for the defendant.


MELLOTT, District Judge.

Two questions are raised by, or are incidental to, defendant's motion to dismiss: (1) Is there extant an adjudication, binding upon this court, as plaintiff contends, that he was engaged in interstate commerce at the time of his injury and hence may prosecute the instant suit to recover damages under the Federal Employers' Liability Act?1 (2) If not, do the stipulated facts show that plaintiff was not engaged in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases